Flexibility in the Workplace & Discrimination by Association: Sharon Coleman Vs Attridge Law

            
 
Case Studies | Case Study in Business, Management, Operations, Strategy, Case Study

ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection

Case Details:
Case Code : HROB115
Case Length : 16 pages
Period : 2001-2008
Pub Date : 2008
Teaching Note :Not Available
Organization : Attridge Law/ miscellaneous
Industry : Law/ miscellaneous
Countries : UK, Europe

To download Flexibility in the Workplace & Discrimination by Association: Sharon Coleman Vs Attridge Law case study (Case Code: HROB115) click on the button below, and select the case from the list of available cases:

Human Resource and Organization Behavior | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Human Resource and Organization Behavior, Case Studies
Price:
For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 300;
For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 300 + Shipping & Handling Charges extra

» Human Resource and Organization Behavior Case Studies
» HRM Short Case Studies
» View Detailed Pricing Info
» How To Order This Case
» Business Case Studies
» Area Specific Case Studies
» Industry Wise Case Studies
» Company Wise Case Studies

Custom Search


Please note:
This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.



Chat with us

Strategic Management Formulation, Implementation, & Control, 12e

Please leave your feedback

Leave Your Feedback

ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India ICMR India RSS Feed

<< Previous

Introduction Contd...

She approached the court with her case in August 2005, claiming constructive dismissal and disability discrimination - by virtue of being discriminated against because of association with a disabled person, or in other words, discrimination by association.

Her case was initially heard at a UK Employment Tribunal, which referred the case to the ECJ to see if current European Union (EU) legislation could apply to people caring for a disabled person.

On July 17, 2008, the European Court ruled in her favor.

Human Resource and Organization Behavior | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Human Resource and Organization Behavior, Case Studies

The case was then to return to the UK and be heard by the Employment Tribunal that had originally referred it to the ECJ. The Tribunal was expected to then attempt to interpret the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA) to cover discrimination by association. The Act would have to be amended if the Tribunal was unable to use the laws prevailing at the time.

The decision was expected to pave the way for other carers to make similar claims and experts warned that it would lead to many more such claims being made.

Louise Donaldson, an employment lawyer with law firm Pinsent Masons LLP, said, “A carer of a disabled person may have a much stronger weapon in terms of being able to bring a disability discrimination claim if their request to work flexibly is refused. Although flexible working is an obvious area where associative discrimination comes into play, any less favourable treatment which is shown to be by reason of a person's association with a disabled person will give grounds for a disability discrimination claim.”5...

Excerpts >>


5] “Disability Discrimination Act Can Extend to Carers, Rules ECJ,” www.out-law.com, July 24, 2008.

 

Case Studies Links:- Case Studies, Short Case Studies, Simplified Case Studies.

Other Case Studies:- Multimedia Case Studies, Cases in Other Languages.

Business Reports Link:- Business Reports.

Books:- Textbooks, Workbooks, Case Study Volumes.